Replacement Shower Door Magnetic Strip

You ask, I answer

In September last year, I did a survey via e-mail to me (and many others, clarifying) for a university. Today, rummaging through my computer files and found it gave me something to Chapatín, to see that despite the changing political scenario we have experts imente recent weeks, I'm agreeing with 95% of my answers. What could respond after 28 July?

1. Of all that you can miss Peru, or which may need, what do you think is most important? certainly education.

2. Of all the proposals you've heard so far of the likely presidential candidates, does anyone somehow solves the problem you mentioned? Why? not listen to presidential proposals. We are in a country without a conscience vote, so the candidates themselves do not care much for forwarding proposals now because they know that most of people not interested in listening. In the end they vote for sympathy or convenience does not have much to do with what is best for the country but for yourself.

3. " Which is more important: a boss or a leader? Do you understand the difference? A leader is someone who is obeyed and a leader is someone who is followed by admiration. What needs to Peru? Neither . You need someone with commitment. And that is quite difficult.

4. Imagine that presidential candidates are not what you know but a person close to you, a friend or relative. If so what are family / friend you would choose as president? Why, What characteristics does this person for their choice? I do not speak of possibilities but realities. If the purpose of the question is what should be a candidate for president, for commitment, capacity (intellectual obviously) gift control, patience and lots of "leash."

5. If the President of the Republic were an animal, what animal would it be? What animal would need to Peru in the presidential chair? Why? An ant. Goes unnoticed because it is organized, dedicated only to work and coy and does not fuck anybody.

6. " You do need a candidate to identify with him? compelling proposals and commitment to fulfill based on the possibilities.

7. politician (president, mayor, minister, Congress) that you've known and most admired is ... why? None. They are there to be admired but to work with and for the people. Simple. This is not about inflating egos and create myths.

8. In 3 words: Keiko Fujimori ... not joking.

9. In 3 words: Ollanta Humala ... A true clown.

10. In 3 words: Jaime Baily ... Come unless

11. In 3 words: Alejandro Toledo ... Maybe, maybe, maybe.

12. In 3 words: Pedro Pablo Kuczynski ... the best option.

13. If Jaime Baily was an incomplete puzzle that is missing 3 pieces to be the perfect candidate ... what do you think would be those 3 pieces? Reliability, dependability and reliability.

14. In your opinion, the best proposal you've heard Jaime Baily is ... why? Improving the state educational system for public school students enjoy the same quality of education that can provide a private one. For me, (sorry for the insistence) education is the foundation of everything. Without it the country will continue giving birth to people useless, worthless people to get out of underdevelopment in which we live eternal. It's useless as a society grow economically if we continue to stagnate.

15. And the worst you've heard is ... why? Starting from the premise that Bayly's proposals are quite romantic, if not a bit difficult to meet, I think they are all "nice" about the role of a history of a great country with a happy ending. So maybe people applauds the ends but not taken seriously. I do not think therefore that one can speak of a "worse", but do not quite agree with both. First, the legalization of drugs, because going back to what I repeat and tummy, you can not venture to do so in a country without education, without conscience or thought a certain level of concluding that the measure seeks to actually reduce their consumption. If it does happen here otherwise. For such proposals should be trained people first, and that is not easy. The other proposal is the elimination not conceive of the military. While we all want not only a country but a peaceful world, we can not close our eyes to it and make us fools. In addition, some people seem not to understand is that these institutions perform different tasks and are not just waiting for a conflict with a machine gun in his hand. Less spending on weapons, yes. Dislocation, no.

16. Imagine Baily is already president, what reactions would think internationally?, What would be the general comment in the world? Do you bother? Would you like? I do not like to talk about possibilities. I do not know if they make fun or not, I do not think they have mocked when Aligi to Bucaram in Ecuador or Lula Da Silva in Brazil. Nor do I think that would bother me. I would not give more around the bush. Yes is democratically elected is little or nothing one could do. Would be respected.

17. In your opinion, what are the top five problems facing Peru?

Bad Education, which is the mother of the other problems. Until that is resolved, what name more.

18. common Describe the worst traits that you believe have had all the presidents of Peru.

corruption, demagogy and extreme selfishness. If you want that position can not think of yourself.

19. Now best describes the common traits they have been presidents of Peru.

In recent history I believe that except for Toledo, all had sympathy. Have fallen well as people but as rulers have all left much to be desired.

20. Imagine Baily came president, ruled and today, after 5 years, is completing his government ... what do you think will be the Peru? Describe all aspects that seem relevant.

I'm not talking about possibilities. And believe me not one that is more than remote. Bayly ultimately did not apply. I'm pretty convinced of that. But here you never know. We live in wonderland, anything can happen.

How To Unlock T7316e Voicemail

PPKausas and other fears of Solomonic

The first goal of the race this year will cross on Sunday. Convinced now, that will not be until June when President habemus exclaim, I sit writing (Siaca then I flip the tortilla) My view of the stage of this first stage from all sides has left much to be desired.

And I mean cold, without passion, but where they go hide my preferences, I hope not misunderstand as an incentive to support this option.

straw Rabo

Support Pedro Pablo Kuczynski from that in 2009 began to flirt with the idea to run for president of the republic. I support it, as I said in previous post (and as my dad has reminded me more than once), since the government formed early the past decade. I believe and trust in your proposal, I trust him and I am convinced that this contest does not get better than yours.

is perhaps for this conviction, which started with a hunch but caught on with an analysis and comparison with the proposals of their containers, that the smell makes me uncomfortable "anti-PPK" since a few weeks ago has become in the standard of those who do not support it. It turns out that within days PPK support went from being cool to be huachafo . The gringo went from being the most qualified candidate of the unconscious. Became the wasted vote.

always annoyed me to do what everybody does. Under that premise will support the reasons why I do not fit in many places and done on time that make you feel what it's worth. I will not deny my chiripiorca gave me when I realized that we began to invade the "gentita" intended to vote this time for the cool uncle. Those who cried out for a pole, a bracelet or a stuffed animal, but did not know and write the candidate's name. Those who came by pure pose, that pose both critical and now I had to swallow.

and swallowing

see things differently and I can understand that in politics there will always be people out of arguments to support their preferences. I think it's wrong, definitely, but try to change the mentality of a society like ours, is something that will take longer than many would like. Therefore, those votes, as, are necessary. As necessary as the votes a year ago led the mayor to Susan Villarán. Many people supported them in the contest, the lady was greener than his scarf. Many thought it was really the best option and that his plan of government was best suited. But they know perfectly well that only with their votes, Susan would not have gotten where he arrived. It was a vote of "poser" who made the "Aunt posh "is now the boss of the municipality.

is why today I find it funny that many of those (many) who once stood quietly to see that fashion invaded their candidate is now dare to lift a finger to none and laugh at the now famous PPKausas. I find it pathetic that they will be accused of huachafo by placing a symbol in the images of their social networks when that choice themselves instituted the wave of putting your photo more paths alongside marquetry phrases that I think were just huachafo. It seems absurd that when they had the poser of his party, consider that what they were doing was "political" and today, when they see someone else has an even stronger, tick the same initiative as a "fad." And the most laughable is seen as only engaged in criticism and self-proclaimed smart when voters do not realize that it also responds to a posería effect as strong as they despise.

False Messiah

Nonsense

the fair. Obviously you can not compare with most voters of the candidates currently leading in all polls, because, sadly, ignorance and resentment weighs on them by those who aspire to the position take advantage of their discontent into believing that electing the leadership of the country will all be equal, which reflects the most repulsive populism. But then, how do you understand that people who do not have the guilt of having a level of education so poor that the solution is not to pretend that everyone is equal because it is absurd, we're not. What to look for is that there is equality of opportunity. That education a child receives in a state school is of the same quality as that provided in a payment center. This is the mother of the lamb, education, without it we nothing but what we do understand that the one who is going to trust a guy with such limited intellectual capacity that only dedicated to stoke the anger of an industry whose pocket does not know so hackneyed economic growth. How do you understand that to one that is carried away by the demagoguery of a woman who has no more merit to be where is to be "daughter" and that he believes build ten thousand colleges that will eventually fall apart, is to solve the problem of education.

With those people I can not get it again, not your fault, not having developed his analytical skills. And really not looking to go against those who do have but they think differently. But much less I'll let you underestimate me drawing a scenario where the only thing that can get rid of a setback is Alejandro Toledo.

With the "sun of solidarity" out of the race (by their own gaffes) at this time the "conscious vote" is split between the cholo and the gringo, and neither wants to budge. I respect those who trust that their candidate is the best option, but not those that already accuse us of being the virtual fault that the country goes to hell for not supporting Toledo. Why should he be the only savior? Is it because according to polls is the one who beats Humala in a runoff? Ok, if you are going to talk about polls, we see the trend. The only one who has gone along with Humala has been PPK. Toledo continues down, (something impossible to sustain finish thanks to the absurd law that prohibits figures show a week before the election) Kuczynski however, continues to grow in addition to a core vote that does not leave two days before the polls. Why not then ask that he resign as Alexander? Is not he who is self-proclaimed champion of democracy? Why not have him that enaltecería gesture that would leave the carpet and clean for 2016? The only argument is that chakana are the ones that would bypass Humala. I do not agree. PPK has for me, the same possibilities. Does anyone believe that Toledo's supporters would where Humala? Does anyone believe that in a second round supporters Castañeda, Humala would go where? Does anyone really believe that being out of the race, the leaders would be pronounced in favor of the candidacy of PPK by calling for support against the threat "nationalist"?.

all joining (for what would have six weeks, not hours, as now) to support a candidate to ensure continuity, it is more logical to paint a scenario polarized between rich and poor. The latter is dropped in the game who now leads the polls. It seeks to show that many of us have neglected the complex would become the only weapon that would use Humala and company. It would have a month of hard work to put aside this time to the gringo clown to show what it is really against his opponent, the more able. Why underestimate all Peruvians? Why insist that our only salvation is to Toledo just because it has "Peruvian factions? For beyond the appearance, I think Toledo and PPK are equal.

Finally, we are not outrageous. The last days there are more of a folly that has proclaimed Nostradamus hallucinating that comes the Apocalypse. That 2012 has no face but Olla Maya. Means a setback, yes, but this country do people live there, not who governs. I think that Peruvians today are not as submissive and would leave us so easily intimidated. And here we return to the topic of "poser", those who say "if I go out of the country Humala" when not afford to do so. Or Toledo or PPK will stay in Peru if they lose, so it serves us no good to cling to their nominations to feel that we do not sink. That same contempt with which we look today believe it is the other who should resign, let's use it well (happen) to look to the palace if he is elected is a threat to the advanced. Same courage that will be used for express our disagreement with a model that does not lead us anywhere. And not call the fight or anything, but if it is to be brave for something, you must be brave for everything or shut up.

Or what ... Hence "if you tremble?