Wednesday, April 6, 2011

How To Unlock T7316e Voicemail

PPKausas and other fears of Solomonic




The first goal of the race this year will cross on Sunday. Convinced now, that will not be until June when President habemus exclaim, I sit writing (Siaca then I flip the tortilla) My view of the stage of this first stage from all sides has left much to be desired.

And I mean cold, without passion, but where they go hide my preferences, I hope not misunderstand as an incentive to support this option.


straw Rabo

Support Pedro Pablo Kuczynski from that in 2009 began to flirt with the idea to run for president of the republic. I support it, as I said in previous post (and as my dad has reminded me more than once), since the government formed early the past decade. I believe and trust in your proposal, I trust him and I am convinced that this contest does not get better than yours.

is perhaps for this conviction, which started with a hunch but caught on with an analysis and comparison with the proposals of their containers, that the smell makes me uncomfortable "anti-PPK" since a few weeks ago has become in the standard of those who do not support it. It turns out that within days PPK support went from being cool to be huachafo . The gringo went from being the most qualified candidate of the unconscious. Became the wasted vote.

always annoyed me to do what everybody does. Under that premise will support the reasons why I do not fit in many places and done on time that make you feel what it's worth. I will not deny my chiripiorca gave me when I realized that we began to invade the "gentita" intended to vote this time for the cool uncle. Those who cried out for a pole, a bracelet or a stuffed animal, but did not know and write the candidate's name. Those who came by pure pose, that pose both critical and now I had to swallow.

and swallowing
see things differently and I can understand that in politics there will always be people out of arguments to support their preferences. I think it's wrong, definitely, but try to change the mentality of a society like ours, is something that will take longer than many would like. Therefore, those votes, as, are necessary. As necessary as the votes a year ago led the mayor to Susan Villarán. Many people supported them in the contest, the lady was greener than his scarf. Many thought it was really the best option and that his plan of government was best suited. But they know perfectly well that only with their votes, Susan would not have gotten where he arrived. It was a vote of "poser" who made the "Aunt posh "is now the boss of the municipality.

is why today I find it funny that many of those (many) who once stood quietly to see that fashion invaded their candidate is now dare to lift a finger to none and laugh at the now famous PPKausas. I find it pathetic that they will be accused of huachafo by placing a symbol in the images of their social networks when that choice themselves instituted the wave of putting your photo more paths alongside marquetry phrases that I think were just huachafo. It seems absurd that when they had the poser of his party, consider that what they were doing was "political" and today, when they see someone else has an even stronger, tick the same initiative as a "fad." And the most laughable is seen as only engaged in criticism and self-proclaimed smart when voters do not realize that it also responds to a posería effect as strong as they despise.


False Messiah

Nonsense
the fair. Obviously you can not compare with most voters of the candidates currently leading in all polls, because, sadly, ignorance and resentment weighs on them by those who aspire to the position take advantage of their discontent into believing that electing the leadership of the country will all be equal, which reflects the most repulsive populism. But then, how do you understand that people who do not have the guilt of having a level of education so poor that the solution is not to pretend that everyone is equal because it is absurd, we're not. What to look for is that there is equality of opportunity. That education a child receives in a state school is of the same quality as that provided in a payment center. This is the mother of the lamb, education, without it we nothing but what we do understand that the one who is going to trust a guy with such limited intellectual capacity that only dedicated to stoke the anger of an industry whose pocket does not know so hackneyed economic growth. How do you understand that to one that is carried away by the demagoguery of a woman who has no more merit to be where is to be "daughter" and that he believes build ten thousand colleges that will eventually fall apart, is to solve the problem of education.

With those people I can not get it again, not your fault, not having developed his analytical skills. And really not looking to go against those who do have but they think differently. But much less I'll let you underestimate me drawing a scenario where the only thing that can get rid of a setback is Alejandro Toledo.

With the "sun of solidarity" out of the race (by their own gaffes) at this time the "conscious vote" is split between the cholo and the gringo, and neither wants to budge. I respect those who trust that their candidate is the best option, but not those that already accuse us of being the virtual fault that the country goes to hell for not supporting Toledo. Why should he be the only savior? Is it because according to polls is the one who beats Humala in a runoff? Ok, if you are going to talk about polls, we see the trend. The only one who has gone along with Humala has been PPK. Toledo continues down, (something impossible to sustain finish thanks to the absurd law that prohibits figures show a week before the election) Kuczynski however, continues to grow in addition to a core vote that does not leave two days before the polls. Why not then ask that he resign as Alexander? Is not he who is self-proclaimed champion of democracy? Why not have him that enaltecería gesture that would leave the carpet and clean for 2016? The only argument is that chakana are the ones that would bypass Humala. I do not agree. PPK has for me, the same possibilities. Does anyone believe that Toledo's supporters would where Humala? Does anyone believe that in a second round supporters Castañeda, Humala would go where? Does anyone really believe that being out of the race, the leaders would be pronounced in favor of the candidacy of PPK by calling for support against the threat "nationalist"?.

all joining (for what would have six weeks, not hours, as now) to support a candidate to ensure continuity, it is more logical to paint a scenario polarized between rich and poor. The latter is dropped in the game who now leads the polls. It seeks to show that many of us have neglected the complex would become the only weapon that would use Humala and company. It would have a month of hard work to put aside this time to the gringo clown to show what it is really against his opponent, the more able. Why underestimate all Peruvians? Why insist that our only salvation is to Toledo just because it has "Peruvian factions? For beyond the appearance, I think Toledo and PPK are equal.

Finally, we are not outrageous. The last days there are more of a folly that has proclaimed Nostradamus hallucinating that comes the Apocalypse. That 2012 has no face but Olla Maya. Means a setback, yes, but this country do people live there, not who governs. I think that Peruvians today are not as submissive and would leave us so easily intimidated. And here we return to the topic of "poser", those who say "if I go out of the country Humala" when not afford to do so. Or Toledo or PPK will stay in Peru if they lose, so it serves us no good to cling to their nominations to feel that we do not sink. That same contempt with which we look today believe it is the other who should resign, let's use it well (happen) to look to the palace if he is elected is a threat to the advanced. Same courage that will be used for express our disagreement with a model that does not lead us anywhere. And not call the fight or anything, but if it is to be brave for something, you must be brave for everything or shut up.

Or what ... Hence "if you tremble?


0 comments:

Post a Comment